Interesting Videoclips of the Week (August 3 – August 9, 2013)

Editor’s Note
In this series of articles, we include important or interesting
videoclips with our comments. This is an article that expresses our
personal opinions about comments made on Television and in Print. It is
NOT intended to provide any investment advice of any type whatsoever. 
No one should base any investing decisions or conclusions based on
anything written in or inferred from this article. Investing is a
serious matter and all investment decisions should only be taken after a
detailed discussion with your investment advisor and should be subject
to your objectives, suitability requirements and risk tolerances.

1. Taper Schmeper?

Last week, we wondered whether Bernanke had merely punted on the taper or whether it was game over for his taper. The question was prompted by the following statement in the FOMC statement.

  • “… inflation has been running below the Committee’s longer-run objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable”
  •     “The Committee sees the downside risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having diminished since the fall. The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective could pose risks to economic performance, but it anticipates that inflation will move back toward its objective over the medium term”

We all know that Bernanke’s enemy number one is deflation or deflationary expectations. Therefore, we believe that, as long as inflation is trending lower, Bernanke-chaired Fed will not taper.

This week, Byron Wien joined in dismissing the possibility of a taper on CNBC SOTS on Tuesday, August 6. His reasoning was based on economic growth:

  • well, one of the things that the policy makers have to reflect on is that the economy is only growing less than 2% with all of the monetary easing that we have done. furthermore, I don’t see any reason for tapering whatsoever. We are not at the inflation target of 2%; we are not at the unemployment target of 7% or 6.5%, so there are no signs in terms of the macro factors that would indicate that the Fed should stop easing. Moreover,  I think the economy needs that, because there is no fiscal stimulus, and we are totally dependent on the monetary stimulus to keep the economy humming along at a very modest 2% growth rate.

The day before, Dennis Gartman dismissed inflation and insisted on CNBC Closing Bell on Monday, August 5 that the Fed should worry about deflation:

  • we are growing one whale of a large crop; we are also going to have a huge soybean crop; but corn being the dominant input to meat production, to cattle and livestock, turkeys & chicken & such, we are gonna close to at least 14.5 bushel corn crop and the oldest rule in the book is that a large crop always seems to get larger; we have had adequate rains, we had great weather and we are going to have a very large corn crop putting downward pressure upon food prices for a long period of time; throw into that the fact that next year you are going to have an extraordinarily low fertilizer price with what happened last week in Potash; that’s gonna come to fruition very quickly in Brazil, low prices are going to increase production there & we are going to have even a larger corn crop next year because of fertilizer prices; so on balance, food prices are going to stay under pressure for a long period of time..that’s going to take pressure of the Fed to worry about inflation.
  • you don’t have a problem with inflation; you have a problem with deflation. And that’s what the Fed is worried about.

And David Kotok is even more bearish about inflation than Dennis Gartman (see 2.1 below):

  • “I believe the trend of inflation is headed towards 1% and may go under it

Yes, we did hear esteemed Fed members like Evans, Fisher & Lockhardt address the taper issue this week. But, following Bill Gross, we only listen to Bernanke, then to Yellen & finally to Dudley.

By the way, what would happen to treasury yields if Bernanke tapers as inflation is trending towards 1% and as growth trajectory flattens? That depends on whether you think tapering is tightening or not? We do and therefore we think tapering-tightening into a slowing economy would push yields lower and not higher. 


2. Bond Market.

The Treasury market behaved well this week with the 10-year yield closing below the key level of 2.60%. But taper probability did not move much based on the 5-year yield which stayed around 1.36%. The biggest move was in the 30-year yield which fell by 6 basis points to 3.63%.

CNBC’s Betty Quick described the consensus opinion as “aversion to Treasuries” on Friday morning. The aversion word certainly describes the views expressed by Byron Wien (see 2.3 below). But we did find two actual investors, David Kotok and Marc Faber, who dared to go against the deeply held convictions of Ms. Quick and Mr. Wien. Marc Faber is only buying long duration treasuries as a trade (see 2.4 below) but David Kotok considers today’s pricing of long duration municipals as a “gift”.

2.1 David Kotok on BTV Street Smart on Tuesday August 6, 2013

  • “I happen to be in a more restrictive mode these days because I don’t think we are going to launch into robust recovery and I believe the trend of inflation is headed towards 1% and may go under it.“.
  • “and so the bond market I think has got it wrong.. In fact I think the bond market is a buy here especially in the Muni world,
  • “I took cash up in the last week or two weeks first time in a long time..  double digit cash.. high for us”
  • “5 year target is one way to do it – we would do it another way for individuals we raised tax exempt municipals which are a gift… they are being given away nearly free – the yields of very high grade munis are between 4-5%, close to 5%; taxable equivalent yield on something like that is 9-95% ; depending on your tax bracket it could be 10%; think about it?
  • where am I going to put my money – AA, AAA quality credit and compound the equivalent of 9-10%? I don’t know the stock market delivers that expectation; I don’t know that real estate does; … you see this picture and you say I need to shift balance; in most accounts we actually took stocks down in favor of raising bonds.. in balanced accounts I lowered the stock side and raised the bond side

Our views are irrelevant but we do concur with Mr. Kotok. In fact, we recall an investment conference in the summer of 2000 when everyone was bullish on stocks and bearish on bonds. At that time the closed end Muni funds were yielding 10%-12% in taxable equivalent yields. That was a great buying opportunity.

Today many NY closed end funds yield 7%+ after all taxes. So if Kotok is correct, then these yields could prove to be a buying opportunity. But they act ugly, really ugly. They go down virtually every day because individual investors are running out of Muni funds, we are told. But David Kotok is doing just the opposite.


2.2 Louise Yamada
on CNBC FM on Tuesday, August 6

  •  structural bear markets for interest rates have run 22 to 37 years. generally the reversals from falling rate cycles to rising rate cycles are very slow, multi-year saucer like affairs which is exactly what we’re getting over a two-year period. you are breaking the 2007 down trend which is the first step; you’ve broken out through this level of the base. that came in around 2.41%.
  • so now you’re in a trading range between 2.41% and 2.74%. So, again, you could see a consolidation within that range which I think would be constructive. but we’re looking for higher rates further out. If you go to 2.71%, all bets are off — we see 3%, ultimately 3.50% and then you get a large amount of resistance around 4%.


2.3 Byron Wien
on CNBC SOTS on Tuesday, August 6

  • No, you are not going to buy any bonds; I am not recommending any purchase of Treasuries.


2.4 Marc Faber on CNBC Futures Now on Thursday, August 8

  • “Now I believe along
    with Gold, the bond market is oversold;  near term the bonds could
    rally
    . As a trade, I would consider buying some Treasury Notes.”

On Friday, CNBC clarified this call to say Faber was recommending buying long term Treasuries.


3. David Tepper vs. Marc Faber & Carter Worth

Stephen Weiss, a CNBC Fast Money contributor & a golf buddy of David Tepper, reported Mr. Tepper’s views about the stock market on Monday.

  • “David Tepper telling me that stocks are still reasonable, in his words, probably still the only place to be. Made it clear that he’s still long. Maybe not quite as bullish as he was, because of the move we’ve had, but he made it clear, if I was super bullish before, I’m just bullish now. So clearly, David Tepper thinks quite highly of the U.S. stock market at the current time. Asked about Europe, as well. we’ve been hearing from a lot of people, …  looking for opportunities in Europe. I asked David about Europe, where he said Europe is bottoming, but that does not mean there can’t still be problems.”

Marc Faber, another well known investor, is bearish and expects a 20% decline by this year-end. He sees a parallel to the rally in 1987 which went up till August 25, 1987 and fell apart (see section 4.5 below).

Marc Faber may have begun the discussion but Carter Worth added the meat on Friday. Mr. Worth compared the recent 2-year rally to the recent top in 2011 and to the epic tops in 1937, 1968 & 1987. His basic finding is that “tops have the same feel, over and over”. He found the current rally has 90%+ correlation to the epic tops he mentioned. And which top had the maximum correlation? 1987 with 96% correlation (see clip 1 below)

4. U.S. Equities – Guru Opinions

4.1 Louise Yamada on CNBC FM on Tuesday August 6

  • you’ve seen the market break out here through the all-time high, through 2007, 2000. generally when you see something like that after a structural bear market you could call it a new structural bull market. There is always the caveat that it’s Fed led and whether or not we can sustain that is not question. Right now, August is probably a quiet month. We can see a pull back here. There are some minor divergences coming in but I think you see maybe a ten percent trading range above the 1560 where we broke out through the 2007 peeks. So we’re constructive unless the June lows break.
  • It’s the June low that’s important in terms of holding. That’s approximately a ten percent pull back so if we were to see consolidation above that breakout level you can have a series of ten percent bull backs and move up maybe later in the fall. Then if we see more divergences, we would get more concerned.


4.2 David Rosenberg on CNBC FM on Tuesday, August 6

  • I think over the near term, the very near term, I can see the market struggling. I‘m sure that comes as a big surprise, but I think we’re fully  priced right now. You have price earnings ratios bumping against cycle highs. market vane sentiment is at 64% bumping up against cycle highs; margin debt is up 32 percent year/year. I think there’s a lot of good news priced into the market right now. My sense is that the economy is weak, earnings and revenue growth are back in low single digits, we have to deal with the tapering issue and that’s a matter of when, not if. and the the market is battling against bond yields that are up 100bps from where they were a few months ago.
  • I could see the market struggling over the next couple of weeks and months. I don’t think we’re going to go into a sustained bear market unless we fall back into recession or ythe Fed actually starts to tighten liquidity.. The overall bull market conditions are in place but in terms of a correction, my work shows that at this stage of the liquidity and business cycle, the market is usually up at an 11% or 12% annual rate. Going in to today’s action we were up 18% for the year. I think it would perfectly normal and I would say healthy for the market to enter into a near term corrective mode but that opens up another lag in terms of a buying opportunity. …Of course it’s a two edge sword because if the markets corrected significantly the Fed wouldn’t bother tapering off and put those concerns onto the back burner. My sense is that the markets will undershoot and overshoot.

4.3 Byron Wien on CNBC SOTS on Tuesday, August 6

  • “well, not a whole lot higher, but maybe flat. we will probably be going lower first as we have been for the last couple of days. the earnings, and look at the first quarter and the second quarter GDP are disappointing and earnings are disappointing, and the thing that I’m most worried about are revenues that are disappointing and that means that more trouble is ahead. So I’m concerned. We were up 20% the year-to-date before this decline happened and I‘m worried that is an awful lot to do in seven months.”&nbs
    p;
  • “there are still equities to buy in the pharmaceutical area and technology, and I think that Mexico is attractive and I like Japan and plenty of places to go

4.4 Dennis Gartman on CNBC Closing Bell on Thursday, August 8

  •  you a had a huge rally. when we went into the nonfarm payrolls number, I thought it was wise to take half of it off. And then the other day, I took the other half off. This is still a bull market. one can only be very long or reasonably long or neutral. I‘m neutral for a while. I’ll come back it being bullish again on either weakness or the market going side ways.
  • when i do – I am simple guy. I will buy the things that if i drop them on my foot it will hurt. I will buy steel, ships, railroads. ... the shipping industry has been battered for the last several years. I think we are about to see the shipping business turn around. We will take capacity out, I hope. and I think that’s one place. you want it look at things that are cheap that stopped getting cheap that have started quietly to turn around. I think shipping is one of those places to take a look and I think steel is clearly a place to take a look.
  • I want to avoid things that I don’t understand. I don’t — I will never understand high-tech. I will never understand big pharma. I will never understand sophisticated technology. it is beyond my ken. I‘m just a poor country boy. I can understand steel because can I count it. I can understand because ship because i can see them unloaded.
  • China, I’m afraid is not slowing done as much as everybody wants to have us believe that china is slowing down. statistics that couple out this morning, when we saw that imports were up what, 10%, exports up 5%. well beyond anybody’s expectation and the fact that imports are up 10% tells me that Chinese economy is doing quite well, thank you very much. I understand brilliant people are out there telling me that china is slowing. I haven’t seen the data to tell me that that’s true.
  • I think people should pay more attention to the Baltic dry index. I started watching 20 years okay when no one knew what it was. now people are paying attention. the chart shows me an index that stopped going down, has made a big base over 2 1/2, 3 years and I think it is about to start turning higher.


4.5 Marc Faber on CNBC Futures Now on Thursday, August 8

  • “I argued last October that we would either have a 20% correction or that we could be in a situation like 1987 when the market rallied very strongly into August 25 and then fell by 40%. So I think that some of the tail winds we had namely massive monetization & falling interest rates are no longer in place. … It seems to me that the Fed has lost control of the bond market. This is very important.”
  • “basically in 1987, we had a very powerful rally but also earnings were no longer rising substantially. And the market became very overbought and the final rally into August 25 occurred with diminishing number of stocks 52-week highs; the new highs list was contracting and we had several breaks in different stocks. And if you look at the last 2 days, it is remarkable. We are close to the old-time high at 1709 on S&P and yet, yesterday and the day before, there were 170 new 52-week lows. That’s a very high figure.”
  • “I think the only way this market can go up is 10-50 stocks that are very strong continue to drive the market higher. The majority of stocks that have actually peaked out when the market peaked on May 22, 1,687, we are not far above the May 22 high. So the majority of stocks are actually lower than they were 2-3 months ago. Homebuilders are down 25% off their highs.”
  • closing price at year-end – I think lower than today. May be 20% lower.”


4.6 Marc Faber
on CNBC Fast Money on Friday, August 9

  • “I think they’re [resource and material stocks] rallying because people are beginning to realize that with all the money printing, that is going on, commodities may bottom out soon, and that assets may be more desirable to own than paper.”
  • “… there has been a huge outperformance of the U.S., vis-a-vis emerging markets over the last, say, 18 months. outperformance of, say, roughly 30%. So it’s logical that some people say, okay, the U.S. is up there, Europe is down, and emerging markets have performed so badly, let’s move back into the emerging economies. So I would say this is too early. I think the emerging markets may rebound somewhat, but I think in general, they will head lower.”

4.7 Laszlo Birinyi is as bullish as ever, according to CNBC’s Patti Domm:

  • Patti Domm @pattidomm – “Birinyi ups 1700 call on S&P to 1740 by year end, doesn’t see correction, says stocks will tread water”

4.8 Lawrence McMillan remains as consistent as ever:

  • “The overbought conditions that had existed a couple of weeks ago were
    largely worked off by a sideways to slightly down stock market, as
    measured by the Standard & Poors 500 Index ($SPX). It seems that the
    bears had their chance, but didn’t seize it once again. There is strong
    support in the 1670-1680 area.”
  • “In summary, unless there is a breakdown by $SPX and some accompanying
    sell signals
    , the market can work higher over the near term

5. Gold

5.1 Louise Yamada on CNBC FM on Tuesday, August 6:

  • Gold is still in a bear market. There is no question about it. You’re up 80 points on that, but you stopped right at resistance, right here. right at the declining short term downtrend and also the 50 day moving average. So I think may be we’re due to come down and test the low again. once before here everybody was calling for it to be a double bottom. we don’t know that until it holds or breaks so I think you get a test of the low and see what level is that? 1200


5.2 Dennis Gartman on CNBC FM on Monday, August 5

  • “I am quietly, tenuously bullish of Gold in terms of Yen & Euros; but anybody who wants to be aggressively long of the Gold market at this point has a very difficult technical circumstance to overcome and each rally has failed at progressively lower levels; each low has been progressively low . That’s a hard chart to be aggressively bullish of. I don’t care what inflation problems you think you are going to have; that chart is telling you inflation is not a problem. incorporate that into what is going on in the grains market and you don’t have a problem with inflation; you have a problem with deflation. And that’s what the Fed is worried about.”


5.3 Marc Faber
on CNBC Futures Now on Thursday, August 8

  • “I think there is one
    group of stocks that should appeal to people who say I want to buy low
    and sell high. This is the gold mining sector and may be some European
    stocks, But in general, the gold mining sector in incredibly depressed
    … since 2007 high, S&P is only up 10% while Gold is up 75%… but
    basically Gold has had a huge correction; sentiment is ultra-bearish,
    and gold mining stocks have been decimated
    . Gold mining industry is in a
    worse shape today than it was at the low of the market in 2008

    Newmont, American Barrick, … – these are names I would
    like at buying and Freeport.”
  • “I like Gold here because relative to
    other assets, to painting, to collectibles, to Manhattan high end
    properties, to Hampton properties, to the Dow Jones, the S&P,
    Russell 200, I think Gold is relatively cheap, it doesn’t have to
    absolutely cheap only relatively.”

Below is a tweet about Gold that caught our eye on Friday morning. The table mentioned in the tweet is interesting indeed.
3m


  • Ryan Detrick CMT – @RyanDetrick – “Here are the 9 times since ’04 $GLD moved to MACD buy on wkly chart. Happened a yr ago and worked. http://stks.co/pO2z”

Featured Videoclips:

  1. Carter Worth on CNBC Options Action on Friday, August 9

1. Correlation between Epic Tops & Current 2-year Rally – Carter Worth on CNBC Options Action – Friday, August 9

We urge all to view this clip after reading the summary below. The charts are the story here.

  • Principles are these – tops have a look and feel over and over and over. Breadth starts to wane and then trouble ensues. In fact, what I have got here are several tops, a recent top and some epic tops. You will see the similarities are quite the same.
  • Let’s look at a recent period of trouble. What I’ve juxtaposed is the current two-year market against where we were into the top of May 2011 before the U.S. got the downgrade. … Basically we plunged from May to August, about 20%.  That’s a fairly benign thing, 20%. but it’s the shape and look of the ascent that precedes the drop that is important.
  • With that, lets look at some epic tops and see how they are quite correlated.  
    • let’s go back to 1937. of course, we had the ’29 crash and spent most of the ’30s coming off those lows. but then we encountered trouble in ’37. it was, frankly, in February, and we plunged basically 50% through to the end of the year. What’s important again is the correlation with the current two years that we’re in right now. it’s about 90-plus percent.
    • take a look at ’68. in 1968 a very similar two-year trajectory, just like the one we’re in now, and then the trouble started. in this case, it was December of ’68. and over the next 18 months, a little bit longer, we dropped about 40%.
    • let’s look at ’87. and it’s the same thing. in fact, of those four or five periods I’ve cited, the one that’s the most correlated, it’s running at a 96% correlation, is this one. If you juxtaposed the current two-year s&p against the two years preceding the crash in ’87, this is the overlay.
  • Does it have to play out that way? No. But it really does speak to what is one playing for by staying long. It is asymmetric risk-reward – upside is limited, and by staying in, you embrace, or prospectively take the punishment that is coming.

Send your feedback to [email protected] Or @MacroViewpoints on Twitter.