Interesting Videoclips of the Week (March 18 – March 24, 2012)

Editor’s Note:  In this series of articles, we include important or interesting videoclips with our comments. This
is an article that expresses our personal opinions about comments made
on Television and in Print. It is NOT intended to provide any investment
advice of any type whatsoever.  No one should base any investing
decisions or conclusions based on anything written in or inferred from
this article. Investing is a serious matter and all investment decisions
should only be taken after a detailed discussion with your investment
advisor and should be subject to your objectives, suitability
requirements and risk tolerances.

1. The Worst Week of the Year!

That is what FinTV kept telling us on Friday as VIX was falling almost 5% to close below 15. This week, the Dow dropped by just over 1% and the S&P by about 0.5%. This is what used to happen intra-day just a few months ago. Financials & Technology just don’t want to go down or stay down on negative days. And this is bull market leadership, the traditional leadership.

The news this week was really negative with China slowing down and Europe clearly slowing. We kept hearing about rumors of an imminent coup in China. Just a whiff of this stuff would have been enough to take the S&P down hard a few months ago. But, now the market just yawns

When different personalities like Richard Bernstein (clip 1 below) and Jim O’Neill (clip 2 below) come together (in spirit) to hail American “secular outperformance” and “long term structural improvement“, perhaps the U.S. Stock market does deserve to yawn at global issues like China and EM.

The most succinct comment about the market’s yawn came from Lawrence McMillan of Option Strategist:
  • “In summary, despite some weakening technical indicators, the market’s trend is bullish until support levels (1375-1380) are broken“.

2. The U.S. Economy

This, we continue to believe, is the most important determinant for the U.S. Stock market. So far, bulls like Jim O’Neill have won all the rounds in 2012. Economists who have been superbly correct in the past are now facing a degree of derision if not outright ridicule. But the two we follow seem confident about their pessimistic forecasts

Recently Lakshman Achuthan of ECRI wrote his defense in an article titled Why Our Recession Call Stands? He wrote
  • when USCI (US Coincident Index) growth is in a downturn, it’s an authoritative indication that overall U.S. economic growth is actually worsening, not reviving…the growth rates of personal income and industrial production have dropped to their lowest readings since the spring of 2010“.
Mr. Achuthan also discussed seasonal adjustments made to the labor data to explain the number of jobs added. Interestingly, David Rosenberg also brought up this issue in his comments (see clip 1 below):
  • “The employment data were affected by seasonal adjustments. It felt like March and February, okay? If you apply the March seasonal actors to February, employment would have declined”.
Mr. Achuthan’s conclusion is succinct:
  • “The bigger question is, can unprecedented, concerted global monetary policy action repeal the business cycle? The objective coincident and leading indexes that we have always monitored are still telling is that it cannot”. 
For a detailed rebuttal to Mr. Achuthan’s article, read Figuring Out ECRI’s Recession Call on EconoMonitor. 

David Rosenberg states rather simply that “We are basically reliving what happened last year.” (see clip 1 below). His ex-colleague from Merrill Lynch, Richard Bernstein, cautioned people who laugh at Rosenberg’s forecasts:
  • “one has to be careful beating up Dave because Dave has an uncanny ability to be right when people think he is really stupid.”
So where should investors want to be if Mr. Rosenberg turns out to be right. Rich Bernstein spoke for himself:
  • “I want to be in 30-Year [Treasury] Zero Coupon Bonds”.

3. Goldman Sachs call to Buy stocks and Sell Bonds  

On Wednesday, Goldman Sachs strategist Peter Oppenheimer issued a clarion call for investors to buy stocks and sell bonds. The specific call has been reported as:
  • The prospects for future returns in equities relative to bonds a
    re as good as they have been in a generation
Jim O’Neill, Chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, agrees with direction of Mr. Oppenheimer’s call:
  • it seems to me we’re right at the start of the system of big long term structural things improving for the U.S.”
Robert Kapito, President of BlackRock, made a similar sounding call when he stated Trillions could rotate into Dividend Payer stocks (see clip 4 below)On the other hand, Goldman’s own US strategist David Kostin sees the S&P at 1,250 by year end, about 10.5% below this Friday’s close.
Jim Biancofounder & president of Bianco Research, said the following to CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo in response to Peter Oppenheimer’s call:
  • The story I don’t think is new…Bonds have two components of return, they have their coupon and they also have their price change. If you look at total return of bonds up until…beginning of last week, they have outperformed stocks at almost every juncture, whether it is one-month all the way up to 30 years. They have actually been a very good investment.”
Jeff Kronthal, co-founder & co-CIO of hedge fund KLF Diversified, said on CNBC Fast Money:
  • “a lot of their [Goldman’s] call is really on the last page of their report which says you are going to have 10-year growth from 2010 to 2019 of 4.3% globally…the assumption of 4.3% growth to drive that [equity] call is really aggressive.”

4. Treasuries, Gold, and Oil

TLT, the 20-30 year Treasury ETF, reclaimed its 200-day moving average this week after the big sell off last week. The 200-day moving average is pivotal to determining the action of long maturity treasuries in the near term as we argued last week. So we intend to watch it closely. Kudos to Jeff Kilburg of for being correct again in asking CNBC-FM viewers to buy Treasuries on Friday, March 16. 

Jim Rogers is not ready to jump in to buy more Gold just yet, as he told CNBC-FM this week. He also would love to see a collapse in the Chinese stock market because then he can buy more. He is currently short Emerging market stocks as a hedge to his long commodity positions (see clip 3 below).

Someone is looking out for Oil as we wrote last week. Look at the action on Friday. The morning decline in oil prices reversed and Oil rallied hard in the afternoon on rumors of an Israeli attack this weekend. 

5. An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites

Two weeks ago, we quoted from an article by Ronen Bergman, one of the most knowledgeable reporters in Israel:
  • “After speaking with many senior Israeli leaders and chiefs of the military and the intelligence, I have come to believe that Israel will indeed strike Iran in 2012”.
Jeffrey Goldberg is one of the most knowledgeable reporters about Israel in America. Last week, he wrote an article on titled In Iran Standoff, Netanyahu Could Be Bluffing. This week, he reversed himself:
  • After interviewing many people with direct knowledge of internal government thinking,..I’m highly confident that Netanyahu isn’t bluffing – that he is in fact counting down to the day when he will authorize a strike against a half-dozen or more Iranian nuclear sites.
  • One reason I’m now more convinced is that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are working hard to convince other members of the Israeli cabinet that a strike might soon be necessary.
When knowledgeable people reverse their positions and especially when they use expensive words like “highly confident“, we think serious attention should be paid. A barbell of Calls on Oil and 30-Year Treasuries seems like good portfolio insurance to us. 

6. Undisclosed Reversal of opinion on Apple?

Last week we quoted comments about Apple from Carter Braxton Worth (CBW to CNBC’s Melissa Lee) of Oppenheimer. He seemed pretty clear that shorting Apple would not be smart. Read his words straight from CNBC’s transcript: (emphasis ours):
  • Melissa Lee – will he (Worth) be the first on television to say sell Apple? 
  • Carter Worth on Friday, March 16- if you want to stand in front of a bus. Look at charts. Look at a stat. Apple is now 40% above its 150 day moving average. that has happened 6 or 8 times since the ipo. every time it’s higher. so we’re talking about betting against all the odds that this time it’s going to come apart. i want to show the current angle. this is why options trading is the right thing to do. here’s a two-year chart. and this shows how excessive this move is. put this same picture on the long-term and you’ll see again how far above trend — that’s the same channel but a five-year basis. it is a frequency that’s only happened about seven or eight times since the ipo. extreme strength. i have one other thing i would show you. it’s the long-term chart of price per share. versus earnings per share. this is back since 1992. a 20-year chart. the judgment is there’s a lot of risk to go short apple. that’s why we’re going to talk about the options trade. for one that’s long, is it time to trim? it’s not a bad idea.
Trim, yes but short? Phrases like “a lot of risk” and “if you want to stand in front of a bus”
suggest that Carter Worth says No.  

But on Monday morning, Apple announced a dividend and a large buyback. That afternoon, Carter Worth came back on with CNBC’s Bill Griffeth and seemed to say Apple could be shorted. Why seemed? Take a read or listen to his comments:
  • Worth on Monday, March 19 – so we went back and looked, for fun, how does apple do once reaching 40% above 150-day moving average. that’s happened only 12 times since the ipo in 1982. …only two times of the 12 where it goes lower. we are taking the contrarion bet that this will be one of those times because all the news is out.
  • Worth – long-term is quite interesting. this is going back since the — since 2002. right. ten years. and it shows you quite precisely this channel that we have been in. and how basically, we’re moving out of that channel for the first time in quite sometime. and that’s also border line too far too fast. now if you are bold and want to go against the odds, sell short
  • Griffeth – everything says it’s too expensive. crowded trade. but we have Goldman today issuing another price increase, going to $700. and you’re still not convinced it is time to take profit share
  • Worth – stats argue for higher prices….if you look at one in three months, every time this circumstances happen, 40% of that 12 times that happened since the ipo, nine out of 12 and 10 of 12 in the other, this is higher. this is making the bet where this is one of the rare times it is not sustained. we will see.
So he is “not convinced it is time to take profit” but he is “taking the contrarian bet that this is one of those times” it will go lower!  Also now it is ok to “sell short” when on the Friday before, it would have been like standing “in front of a bus“. So what exactly are you saying, Mr. Worth? 

We applaud this change of opinion because we firmly believe in the Keynesian adage about changing one’s mind when facts change. But we wish Mr. Worth had been forthcoming enough to tell CNBC viewers that he was changing his opinion from the previous business day. 

Notice that the facts also changed between Friday and Monday. On Friday, Apple had been 40% higher than its 150 day moving average “6-8 times since the IPO and every time it had been higher“. On Monday, Apple had done so “12 times since the IPO and on 2 of these 12 occasions“, Apple had “gone lower“. Again, we applaud the more diligent fact checking done on Monday. But, Mr. Worth, why didn’t you own up and tell viewers you had made a mistake on the previous day. That’s simply not done, at least not by a Gentleman! Wouldn’t you say so, Mr. Worth?  

7. The Rest of the World is pouring in Myanmar

So said the veteran investor Jim Rogers on CNBC-FM (see clip 3 below). He also gave Myanmar the greatest compliment he could by comparing the current Myanmar opening to China’s opening 40 years ago. Anchor Melissa Lee was surprised, almost stunned to hear such praise about Myanmar . Clearly Ms. Lee does not read Stratfor. (Not done, Ms. Lee, not by an anchor of the “First in Business Worldwide” network.) 

Those who do read Stratfor should run not walk to the superb article by Robert Kaplan titled How Myanmar Liberates Asia on We include a couple of excerpts below:
  • Geographically, Myanmar dominates the Bay of Bengal. It is where the spheres of influence of China and India overlap. Myanmar is also abundant in oil, natural gas, coal, zinc, copper, precious stones, timber and hydropower, with some uranium deposits as well.
  • Myanmar will develop into an energy and natural resource hub in its own right, uniting the Indian su
    bcontinent, China and Southeast Asia all into one fluid, organic continuum
  • Indeed, Kunming, in China’s southern Yunnan province, would become the economic capital of Southeast Asia, where river and rail routes from Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam would converge 
  • .both India’s northeast and Bangladesh will benefit from Myanmar’s political and economic renewal…More broadly, a liberalized Myanmar draws India deeper into Asia, so that India can more effectively balance against China.
Kaplan’s conclusion:

  • But given its immense natural resources and sizable population of 48 million, if Myanmar can build pan-ethnic institutions in coming decades it could come close to being a midlevel power in its own right — something that would not necessarily harm Indian and Chinese interests, and, by the way, would unleash trade throughout Asia and the Indian Ocean world.
Those interested in the rivalry underway in Myanmar between China and India should read our article, Burma – Where China and India Collide – From “Monsoon” by Robert Kaplan.  

We confess we are just as excited as Jim Rogers about the opening of Myanmar. There is just so much history there and pristine natural beauty. The Free India Army marched in mid-1940s from South East Asia all across China through Burma to enter the northeastern states of India in the war against the British. And you know that any site of interest must have a Bollywood song. This 1949 song about Rangoon (now Yangoon) has become a cult song. For those who care, the You Tube clip is below:

This has been remixed several times in recent years. The old style is gone, replaced by needless display of skin and motion of undulating hips. For those who prefer such modernity, search for Mere Piya Gaye Rangoon (My lover has gone to Rangoon) on YouTube. You will get 7 pages of clips

Featured Videoclips

  1. Richard Bernstein & David Rosenberg on CNBC Squawk Box on Thursday, March 22
  2. Jim O’Neill on CNBC Squawk Box on Wednesday, March 21
  3. Jim Rogers on CNBC Fast Money on Thursday, March 22
  4. Robert Kapito on CNBC Fast Money on Monday, March 19

1. Reunited & It Feels So Good   – Richard Bernstein & David Rosenberg on CNBC Squawk Box – Thursday, March 22

Richard Bernstein and David Rosenberg were for years the strategist and economist at Merrill Lynch. They added tremendous value to client of Merrill Lynch during their tenure. It was a very smart idea to get them together in one segment. CNBC even played the Reunited & It Feels So Good at the beginning of the segment. They were interviewed by Steve Liesman and Kelly Evans, the new talent at CNBC.

  • Liesman – Richard, you think has the American economy turned the corner here and have stocks fully priced in that turn?

  • Bernstein – I think the corporate sector is starting to come under pressure. The last reporting period was kind of disappointing. Largest number of negative surprises since 2007. However, the household sector continues to improve. Is it good on an absolute basis? No way. But I think it continues to improve.….Dave was the one who  pointed out many years ago corporate profits in 2007 were the largest percentage of GDP ever. I think that was a very important insight.

  • LiesmanDavid, the bearish call on the economy has not been the right one to date. Are you saying you’ve been early here and the worst is yet to come?.

  • Rosenberg – I would argue on the premise,,,We went into last year believing we would have 3-4% growth. We had 3% growth in 2007 and we would hit escape velocity and even improve on that. Last year, the real GDP growth came in at 1.7%, about half of what the consensus thought. normally going into the full 2nd year of recovery, GDP growth is closer to 4-5%. ..If you want to take a big picture perspective, this goes down as the weakest economic recovery ever, despite all the ramp in government stimulus. That really tells you something.

  • Liesman – order for that argument to stand, you have to ignore the recent stuff. We had fourth quarter growth that was 3%. We’ve had several months in a row now of 200,000 plus growth, a pretty precipitous decline in the unemployment rate. So I wonder if you’re missing the current boat that’s leaving the dock here.

  • Rosenberg – no, I’m not. I‘m basically doing what I do, which is dig beneath the veneer of the headline data, which makes for nice headlines. 3% growth in the fourth quarter, True. Two-third of that growth was just inventory. Real final sales were 1%. that’s very weak. In the first quarter, we’re coming off a January and February where the weather both months were 5 degrees above normal. That’s a 3-standard deviation event.…you had $30 billion of low are utility bills bring up cash flow for the household sector. So Rich is talking about the household fundamentals improving. well, you had basically a tax — a de facto tax cut for the personal sector that’s run its course. We haven’t seen $4 gas hit yet. The employment data were affected by seasonal adjustments. It felt like March and February, okay? If you apply the March seasonal actors to February, employment would have declined.

  • Bernstein – I think this has been going on for two or three years. I think stock markets respond to better or worse, not the absolutes of good or bad. It hard to argue that the U.S. economy has not improved over past two or three years, even over the past year.

  • Evans – …if we get data that says we’re losing momentum, we’re worried about year up, Asia, Global Growth slowing, do those negative surprises make it harder for stocks to keep climbing?

  • BernsteinIn the short term of course. The next reporting period could be messy in my view. But as you look out and look at the US economy over the next year, two years, three years, is the US economy going to improve more or less than other economies around the world? I think it clearly more, that we are in the early stages of a long term period of U.S. asset outperformance.

  • Liesman – how many jobs are because of the heat?

  • Rosenberg – I would say over 40% of the jobs created was weather related. What’s productivity doing? It’s going negative...Output is lagging well behind. This is what we had to last year’s first quarter, Steve. we have four months in a row of private payrolls over 200,000, same sort of sentiment about escape velocity productivity was negative in the first quarter last year, corporate CEOs responded to that by curbing rehiring plans over the next six months. We are basically reliving what happened last year.

  • Evans – Dave, I‘m curious how you express your views at this point? Do you like fixed income?

  • Rosenberg – what started really performing last year is what I call safety and income investing – so I think dividend growth, dividend yield themes will claim leadership in my opinion. Corporate balance sheets, we know are in great shape. You still pick up what 500 basis points spread in the high yield market over Treasuries. That’s still a pretty good place to put money.

  • Bernstein – I will just say, one has to be careful beating up Dave because Dave has an uncanny ability to be right when people think he is really stupid.

  • Liesman – I just want to get your investment outlook. Do you think the market continues higher because of the outperformance of the United States to its recent past and to others around it.

  • Bernstein – I think expectations for the United States among investors are extraordinarily low. If you see where expectations are high, they are in emerging markets.

  • Liesman – where do you want to be Richard, if David is right?

  • Bernstein –  I want to be in 30-year Zero coupon bonds.

  • Liesman – I want to be under a desk (instant thought – does CNBC have that broad a desk? Sorry Steve).

This was a real interview.  Liesman & Evans are a pair who know their stuff. That made the interview fast paced and informative. Steve Liesman is a talent that doesn’t get the recognition he deserves, we think. But Liesman and Evans did not ask the key final question. They did not ask Rich Bernstein whether he owns 30-year Zero Coupon Bonds in his fund and managed accounts. We wish they had. Because that would have told us whether he believes in Rosenberg’s prediction or not.  

2. Start of Long Term Structural Improvement in US + China is Phenomenal – Jim O’Neill on CNBC Squawk Box – Wednesday March 21 

Jim O’Neill is the Chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. He is of course the man who created the acronym BRIC. Here he takes a position that is directly opposite of both Richard Bernstein and David Rosenberg.  In other words, he is extremely bullish on BRIC/EM outperforming US-Europe and he is bullish on American economy, a believer in the escape velocity that Mr. Rosenberg referred to in clip 1 above. 

  • O’Neill – … we find ourselves for the past period, particularly since August but on and off since ’08 with two key things about that. 
    • one is we have low levels of real bond yield because many including policymakers don’t believe things can ever return to normal, and 
    • the other one is we have people that don’t believe world growth can ever do better than it did at point x in the past. Being Mr. BRIC, in reality despite western problem the world’s economy growth rate is trending higher than it has been for the 30 years of my existence. all together it’s really bullish for equities.
  • Kaminsky – Jim, good morning it’s Gary and I’ll say I was with Jim in early January and he was very bullish, very bullish in early January especially about US equity markets. Jim, let me ask you this.if the S&P essentially flat lined or maybe traded off the rest of this yearunder what circumstances do you foresee something like that possibly happening?
  • O”Neill – well, I guess a couple of things. 
    • one is, of course,…the economy loses the improving momentum it’s had. that is, of course possible but I don’t see that either.….it seems to me we’re right at the start of the system of big long term structural things improving for the U.S. I‘m not, you know, if that’s wrong, then that would be one of the thing. 
    • the second thing is, of course, rising oil prices could cause at some point some pretty serious damage for the consumer,  and separately from both of those, 
    • if the Fed suddenly changes its mind abruptly and have a huge quick rise in bond yields that would become a threat to the equity market. short of those things I’m not s
  • Ross – it’s Wilbur Ross, given that everybody feels the bench rate is low on the historical basisand the next move will probably be upward why wouldn’t you focus on absolute returns available in equities rather than simply the relative returns compared to the artificially low treasuries?
  • O”Neill – well, I do….. that’s why the case is so powerful. The current consensus for worldGDP growth is about 3.5%, the current consensus for the U.S. is closer to 2.%.  I think the recovery momentum in the U.S. is at least 2.5% moving possibly towards 3% and for the world, you know, I get more concerned from an absolute perspective if the market price is in a world of 4% or more which is where we are trending up. So it’s not just a relative thing it’s an absolute thing as well.
  • O’Neill –  I’ve become fond of saying this year that China creates the equivalent of another Greece every 11 1/2 weeks. Guess what there is today their loss? 11.5 weeks into 2012. So today is the day that China has created since January another Greece. Who cares about Greece?…So long as Italy is supported and Italy does the right thing, people exaggerate still the global importance of all this stuff. Greece is a lovely country, wonderful people, have big influence on the world. But as an economy and its debt individually on its own it’s meaningless.
  • O’Neill – I mean the structure of European Monetary Union has been shown to be flawed, and there are lots of issues that remain unresolved and not easy to resolve. Yeah, those things will bearound for probably considerable time in the future. But the idea that they are going to be the source of putting an end to the global bull market in equities I just don’t buy that at all.
  • O’Neill – the whole reason why the world economy is trending higher is because of the BRICS. Even though China is clearly deliberately moving to a somewhat softer growth path, you know, as the place gets bigger, its impact on the world alone becomes more and more. We’re only three years off maximum, maybe two years before the 4 BRIC countries become bigger than the United States. These guys between them are driving the world economy. So they are the biggest global story, the next 11 you referred to involves a few of the countries that are also becoming more important such as Indonesia, Turkey, Korea, Mexico. if you put those 4 together with the BRICS, this decade, those eight will create double the amount of global GDP that Europe and the US will do put together. 
  • O’Neill – last year, China went from 5.7 trillion to 7.3 trillion = 4 trillion in change in one year. Greece is 300 billion. so you take 300 billion into 4000, it’s 11.5 weeks. So China creates the economic equivalent of another Greece every 11.5 weeks. They are not far off creating half the United Kingdom these days every year. or 1/10th of euro every year. China thing is phenomenal. Even with it slower rates of growth itself. my opinion on that part it, I’m a bit of a mystery as to why people were freaked out when Premier comments of 7.5% growth. The Chinese latest five year plan which is now over 12 months old told us they were assuming 7% growth. that’s because the Chinese are deliberately focusing on the quality of growth and decidedsometime ago that the days of 10% plus growth were no longer persistently helpful to deal with their ongoing challenges.

3. I hope the China market collapses so… – Jim Rogers on CNBC Fast Money (04:56 minute clip)  – Thursday, March 22

Jim Rogers, the famous investor and lover of commodities through thick and thin, woke up early in Singapore to speak with the CNBC-FM crew, Anchor Melissa Lee, trader Guy Adami and guest trader Keith McCullough. We are glad he did.

  • Lee – Jim, in terms of the pullback that we’ve seen most recently on these China concerns and they started before the HSBC PMI numbers were out today and started this week with the comments from that BHP executive about slowing iron ore demand. Where did you look to first take advantage of this pullback? 
  • Rogers – Melissa, China has been trying to slow its economy down for three years. They have been trying to pop the real estate bubble for three years, so it’s finally bearing fruit, and I’m delighted to see it. They need to do that. It will be good for China, good for the world and it will present opportunities for all of us. I hope that the Chinese market collapses so I can buy Chinese shares.
  • Lee – So at this point, you’re not using minor pullback because you’re anticipating a bigger one which will be a bigger buying opportunity in your view?
  • Rogers – I certainly expect the world to have more of a slowdown in the next year or two and that will be an opportunity for all of us.
  • McCullough – Jim, if you look forward and you see a potential sovereign debt crisis in Japan,  so think about Japanese yen down 10%, U.S. dollar up 10% from here. How do you think about risk managing your long commodities exposure in that environment?
  • Rogers – Well, I usually try to have some shorts of something. I‘m long commodities. If the world economy gets better, commodities are going to do better because of shortages. If the world economy doesn’t get better, they are going to print money. It’s the wrong thing to do, but when they print money, you should own real assets, So what I will do is I will have shorts, probably in the stock market, to protect myself. I’m nearly always hedged one way or the other. For instance, right now I’m short emerging market stocks as a potential hedge.
  • Adami – Jim, thanks for waking up so early. If the collapse in the Chinese shares come to fruition, my belief is that this whole run up shares is predicated on continued China growth. What does that mean for the U.S. stock market?
  • Rogers – well, I’m very pessimistic about the U.S. stock market. Certainly, by the end of this year and into 2013 and 2014, it doesn’t even mean it won’t continue to rally this year. There’s an election this year. Obama wants to get re-elected. He’s doing everything he can to get re-elected, spending money, printing money, putting out good news, artificial or not, but later this year it’s all going to catch up with us. I happen to agree with you 100%. I’m really worried about 2013 and 2014.

At this point, CNBC-FM decided to make money and took a rather unnecessary break. In the process, they hyped up the next big opportunity Rogers sees. Every investor should learn from the investing discipline of Mr. Rogers – He is “nearly always hedged one way or the other”. Investing is always about risk-hedged reward and not based on hope. 

  • Lee – Let us go directly to what you see as Asia’s best kept secret, Myanmar? How the heck do you invest on Myanmar?
  • Rogers well, Melissa, Myanmar, is an astonishing opportunity. 50 years ago, the richest country in Asia and now it is the poorest country because they were closed off. Now they are just opening up as China did 33,34 years ago. I find it wildly exciting. The problem though is that for Americans it is illegal to invest there. We live in the land of the free, Melissa and so we can’t invest where we want to. The rest of the world is pouring in there. There is nothing I can do right now except wait and watch and hope that the day they say you can invest I can jump in.
  • Lee – You want to short long term US Government Bonds. Are you short right now?
  • Rogers – Yeah, I shorted some yesterday. But Melissa, I hasten to tell you, my timing has not been very good in the bond market the last 2-3 years. So if I am doing it,  it is probably the wrong timing.
  • Lee – And you have been long Gold & Silver for quite some time. You are advising people to wait for a pull back? what sort of pullback would attract you to add to your positions?
  • Rogers – If Gold and Silver go down, again I am a bad market timer, if they go down, I will be buying more. If it goes under $1,600, I will buy a little. If it goes $1,500, I will go a little more. Who knows how low it can go? Gold has had big corrections during bull markets in the past, if it got down to $1,200 or $1,300, I hope I am smart enough to buy a lot more. That is not a prediction. I am just saying, if it happens, I hope I can jump in and buy a lot more. Because Gold is going to go much higher and silver too over the next decade

Recall that Jim Rogers advised CNBC viewers against buying Gold on November 29, 2011 (see clip 3 of Videoclips of November 28 – December 2, 2011 article) when it was fashionable to do so. Kudos also to Mr. Rogers for admitting he has been wrong on the bond market for the past few years. Just search for Rogers with this Blog’s advanced search function for evidence. Mr. Rogers does great service to CNBC;s viewers by pointing out his mistakes. Will Doug Kass follow his example and admit to his mistakes in advising CNBC viewers to short TLT or Treasury Bonds?

4. Trillions could rotate into Dividend Payers – Robert Kapito on CNBC-FM – Monday, March 19

Mr. Kapito is the President of BlackRock, the largest asset management firms in the world. Here he reiterates the message that Larry Fink, BlackRock’s Chairman/CEO, has been sending since June 2011. Listen to the clip or read the summary article Trillions Could Rotate into Dividend Payers on We include key excerpts below:

  • $10 trillion is
    sitting in bank accounts – and at these low rates,” he
    says. Eventually he thinks people will grow tired of earning almost
    nothing on their savings. “If only 10% of that money comes out of banks –
    that’s $1 trillion that could go into the market
  • Although he thinks commodities, real estate and MLP’s will all benefit, he’s particularly enthusiastic about dividend-payers.
    “We love the equity dividend story,” he says. “Companies are the
    beneficiary of low rates, so what are they doing, they’re raising
    dividends and buying back stock.”
  • if you’re looking for individual names, “Merck, Pfizer, Verizon, and Johnson & Johnson are all yielding between 3-5%. There are  lots of opportunities,” he says.

Send your feedback to [email protected] OR @MacroViewpoints on Twitter