Interesting TACs of the Week (December 11 – December 17, 2021)

Summary – A top-down review of interesting calls and comments made last week in Treasuries, monetary policy, economics, stocks, bonds & commodities. TAC is our acronym for Tweets, Articles, & Clips – our basic inputs for this article.

Editor’s Note: In this series of articles, we include important or interesting Tweets, Articles, Video Clips with our comments. This is an article that expresses our personal opinions about comments made on Television, Tweeter, and in Print. It is NOT intended to provide any investment advice of any type whatsoever. No one should base any investing decisions or conclusions based on anything written in or inferred from this article. Macro Viewpoints & its affiliates expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information in this article. Investing is a serious matter and all investment decisions should only be taken after a detailed discussion with your investment advisor and should be subject to your objectives, suitability requirements and risk tolerance.


1. Go JP Go

Most of us saw what happened on past Sunday late afternoon. For those who didn’t or don’t remember, here it is:



The above was the 3rd phase of the game. The first phase was a romp by Tom Brady & Tampa Bay; the second phase was a poor performance by Tom Brady & Tampa Bay enabling the Bills to tie the game. It was as if a completely different Brady was revealed in that 2nd half. And this was no ordinary game. As Tom Brady himself admitted, the game against the Bills was the most important game of the rest of the year.  

Then Brady got the chance to score when he got the ball in overtime. The game was on the line on that 3rd & 3 play, the play of the game as CBS analyst Tony Romo said. Watch the above clip from 0:40 to 0:50 & notice that Brady froze out & misdirected Bills No. 49, Trumaine Edmunds, into taking a wrong step. That was enough for Perriman to separate, catch the pass in stride & run for the game-winning touchdown.  

Think about it & you will see Chairman Jay Powell did precisely that on Wednesday in his presser. We all saw a positive winning Powell in his first phase. We actually featured him in our Diwali article in early November. Then a completely different Powell was revealed via Fed minutes on Wednesday before Thanksgiving. That Powell was confirmed & emphasized by his creating the meltdown the following week in his Congressional testimony.  

Think, what was the monetary policy equivalent of the thrashing Bills administered to Tom Brady & Tampa Bay in the 2nd half to tie the game? It was the 3-week brutal flattening of the Treasury curve with the 2-5 year yields going up & the 30-10 yr yields falling in fright of a major blunder by Powell. 

Then came the day of the December FOMC meeting, Wednesday, December 15. It was the most important FOMC meeting of the year with comparisons with 2018 Powell running all over Fin Media. The FOMC statement was true to the Hyde-Powell revelation. But as we see now, that was a misdirection & a freezing of the bad guys.

Because when Powell began his presser, it was the beginning of the winning play of the game. And the markets, like us, were shouting Go JP Go as the presser went on, the monetary equivalent of Run BP Run shouts from Bucs & their fans in the clip above. 

The Bills team in this case (with apology to Bills fans & especially Bond King Gundlach) was the flattening of the Yield Curve. And that was trounced by Jay Powell just as speedily & as decisively as Tom Brady had trounced the Bills. 

(SHY – 1-3 yr Treasury ETF vs. TLT – 20+-yr Treasury ETF)

Yes, in that presser, Powell achieved his goal, a goal emphasized by the line “Powell: FOMC Rate projections don’t represent a plan on BTV screen”. The 30-2 curve steepened fast & hard during his presser & that continued the day after as well. 

But are we just being fanciful? Was there any one who actually noticed what we were clapping for during the presser? Read what Jeffrey Rosenberg of BlackRock said on BTV Surveillance Fed Special after the Powell presser (from 2:07:37 of the clip):

  • “… metric I would focus on is 5-year & shorter real interest rates; there is a complete reversal right now; they are lower than they were going into the meeting; lower front-end real rates & steepening nominal bond curve … “

For us the yield curve was the theorem on Wednesday afternoon and the stock indices were the corollaries. Still, how did the corollaries act?


How did the yield curve theorem act the next day, Thursday December 16? 

  • 30-yr yield up 2.2 bps; 5-yr yield down 7.3 bps; 3-yr yield down 8.2 bps; 2-yr yield down 6.2 bps

A more than 10-bops steepening of the 30–3 yr Treasury curve. Happy Days are here again was our reaction. But Jeffrey Rosenberg was more prosaic after the presser on Wednesday:

  • ” … what you are left with is – may be they will do a little bit but they are not going to do so much to knock the supportive Fed off of supporting financial markets … that’s at least the initial read here …. Fed has really 3 goals – maximum employment, stable prices, financial stability … those two goals, inflation & financial stability, are setting up to be in stark conflict; … the market is voting today that they are going to preference financial stability over fighting inflation… we will see whether that turns out … ” 

That is a heck of a conclusion from Jeffrey Rosenberg, one that very very few on Fin TV will concur with even now, two days after the Fed. 



Finally, what might the Fed’s political masters be thinking of this financial stability over inflation preference? Watch the conversation between Brian Deese, National Economic Council Director, with CNBC’s Sara Eisen on Friday, December 10 & notice that, in the latter half of that conversation, Deese himself characterizes inflation in somewhat of a past tense. That suggests to us that Biden-Dems have decided they cannot risk a stock market debacle because of a policy mistake by a Biden re-nominated Fed Chairman. 


2. Mistake the Fed was about to make 

Recall that we & some others have been using the descriptive term “bond market screaming in terror” for the intense flattening of the yield curve in response to Powell’s rhetoric.  

Why was the Treasury market screaming? The best line came on Friday from ECRI’s Lakshman Achuthan who said that the Fed was “tapering & tightening into the teeth of a sustained cyclical slowdown“. Watch & listen to this really simple & straightforward amplification:

  • ” … growth cyclically has been slowing since last spring & it is not over; the slowdown is not over; … the Fed risks making a serious policy mistake – tapering & tightening into the teeth of a sustained cyclical slowdown; .. people were very surprised , to tell you the truth, how week Q3 was … it was a part of cyclical slowdown that began last spring … when you look at hard data, they are slowing  … we are very clearly in a growth-rate cycle downtrend; … when you look at jobs growth, what is going on with non-farm payrolls; you see it has been declining 7 months straight; … when you take a look at income … growth in real personal income has been going down for 6 months; these are coincident indicators; … we are in a slowdown, you can take it to the bank

Achuthan made a couple of more important points that CNBC, in their unique wisdom, seem to have deleted from the clip below. He pointed out that the tension today stems from a conflict between a cyclical upturn in inflation that is happening coincidentally with a cyclical slowdown in growth. He added that he means cyclical inflation upswing not structural inflation and states that the pace of increase in inflation is topping out. He also pointed that this is happening in the backdrop of a global slowdown with China & Europe and the global industrial cycle (forward indicator) isn’t showing a bottom. 

Now you understand why the Treasury market was screaming in terror of what the Fed might launch? 



And let us not forget that mountain of low-coupon debt that is the world is bearing. We have said before that we think the Fed may be on the verge of a big mistake a la 2007. But there is a stark & dangerous difference between now & 2007:

  • Eric [email protected]Where Is The Debt? In Q1 2007, total public and private debt was 345% of US GDP. Today, total public and private debt is 372% of US GDP. Debt levels are similar, but the composition has radically changed. A breakdown of US Debt to GDP

So what is the big difference? 

  • Eric Basmajian@EPBResearch – Most of the increased indebtedness in the post-2008 period has come in the government sector. There is a threshold in the government sector of roughly 85% of GDP, outlined in the BIS paper “The Real Effects of Debt,” and numerous other academic studies across many countries.


How are we going to deal with this ginormous level of Government Debt? Find another galaxy with a much bigger bond market where we can refinance our earthly government debt at a lower coupon? Barring that it will keep acting as a pull down of real economic growth here on earth. So forget about raising rates big time?

Wait a minute! Wasn’t there another time this was the case? We were not around then, but fortunately some one brought that case up in the minutes before the Powell presser began. That some one is Scott Minerd of Guggenheim and this is what he said on the BTV Surveillance Fed Special on Wednesday, December 15 afternoon::

  • ” … I have looked back in history; I am heavily affected by history; when you look at the 1940s, for instance; we had a period of inflation (“transitory”) that lasted between 1946 & 1949; interest rates peaked, I think, in 1047 around 2.5% and inflation peaked at 20%; so given the policy of financial repression, I have been expecting interest rates to stay well below the rate of inflation …. I have been caught a bit off guard with how strong the inflation has been; but at 7%, we are nowhere near where the Fed was back in 1940s at 20% inflation; … “

Now you see why people like David Bailin of Citi Private Wealth are telling us to expect real interest rates to be negative for the next decade? 


3. Last week & into year-end

Last week was a terrific week for Treasuries. TLT was up 1.3% & EDV, zero-coupon ETF, was up 1.6%. Interest rates were down across the board with 30-yr down 7 bps; 10-yr down 8 bps; 7-yr down 8 bps; 5-yr down 7 bps & 3-yr down 6 bps. A harmonious ride down the curve, you might say.

In stark contrast, stocks were hit hard with Dow down 1.7%, S&P down 1.9%, NDX down 3.2%, RUT down 1.7% (& only index to close up 1% on Friday). Finally, MANAA was torched as well with Microsoft down 5.4%, Apple down 5.%, Netflix down 4.2%, Alphabet down 4,2% & Amazon down 1.2%. 

That & the general oversold condition prompted Tony Dwyer to suggest that we are “closer to the end of the correction” and the “correction is due for a bounce“. He pointed out that Russell 2000 is as oversold as it gets & may be that’s why Russell 2000 was up 1% on Friday. He also pointed out that the advance/decline in the Nasdaq is back to October 20 levels. His opening point was when they come for the defensive leaders (MANAA), that suggests it is probably the end of the correction rather than the beginning. Watch for yourselves:


 A stronger message below: 

  • Macro Charts@MacroCharts – Everyone has a foot out the door. Options Traders are *again* among the most negative in history. Most signals led to market bottoms or rally extensions. The story of 2021: a historic rally fueled by doubt, shakeouts & panics. A textbook Bull Market – get ready for 2022.

Apparently there are lots of people who jump aboard a derailed train:

  • Jason Goepfert@jasongoepfert – All aboard a derailed train, part deux. Despite a pretty hefty loss in $SPY, traders poured more than $6 billion* into the fund. The only other times that happened were during crises.

And Jim Cramer reminded his Mad Money viewers that the Larry Williams year-end trade suggests buying on the coming Tuesday. Cramer also suggested buying small on Monday morning to get started. 


4. Same story – Different points of view 

This past week has really about looking at the same story, same decisions but from very different points of view. So many were stunned at the Treasury market reaction to the Fed decision; so many others saw it to be comforting. Below is such a case about two film makers looking at the same story from very different angles. 

We heard a comment from Jim Cramer this week about something Kelly McGillis said to Harrison Ford in the film Witness. We don’t recall the specific comment but it triggered the association with the film Paap. Witness, as most know, is a male-oriented film about a Police Detective sheltering a young boy & his mother from other rogue cops in his own precinct. He takes the boy & his mother back to their Amish area to hide. The rogue cops come, two die in the shooting & the boss surrenders. The detective goes back to the city. 

How can this fast male-oriented film be transformed into a tender female-oriented film about a young girl who has just begun to blossom into a woman? Enter filmmaker Pooja Bhatt & the result is Paap (Sin). Change the story slightly by making the young woman a caretaker of the young boy instead of his mother, a  young woman who is going to be a lifelong nun in a Buddhist monastery. Then keep every action scene exactly the same and you get Paap, a tender love story about a young woman who suddenly is forced to confront her romantic feelings about a man she is nursing.  

The young woman is so brought up that she is not allowed to have a mirror & she ends up writing her thoughts in a book that she is forced to hide. The film introduces her in the beautiful clip below.


Remember how Rachel (Kelly McGillis) & Book (Harrison Ford) accept the feelings between them?



This was simply not possible for Kaayaa (the young woman)? So words were never said & feelings were always in dreams:



Remember the ending scene in Witness? That was natural for that story.



What about the ending of Paap? Does Kaayaa’s father force her into the monastery or does he accept it is wrong for him to impose that on Kaayaa? You don’t need subtitles for the clip below:



We have a tremendous respect for the art of filmmaking & the ability filmmakers have to tell a story from their own point of view. That is a reason for our pseudonym Cinema-Rasik, rasik means one who loves the essence of what one looks at.

All this from an offhand comment from Cramer! So if you found this section even a tiny bit interesting, thank Cramer. If not, blame us for wasting your time.


Send your feedback to [email protected] Or @MacroViewpoints on Twitter